THE 5-STEP SEQUENTIAL PROCESS IN DISABILITY HEARINGS

There are 5 steps that an administrative law judge must use in determining whether a claimant is disabled under Social Security law.  The 5 steps are sequential.  The claimant must satisfy step one before going on to step 2, etc.  Here are the 5 steps, outlined in brief form.

Step 1.  Is the claimant engaging in substantial gainful activity under 20 CFR 404.1520(B)?

Step 2.  Does the claimant have a medically determinable impairment that is severe or a combination of impairments that is severe under 20 CFR 404.1520(C)?

Step 3:  Does the claimant's impairment(s) meet or medically equal an impairment listed in 20 CFR Part 404, Subpart P, Appendix I (commonly called "the listings")?  If so, the claimant is disabled.  If not, the analysis proceeds to the next step.  Here, the judge must determine the claimant's residual functional capacity (RFC), according to 20 CFR 404.1520(e) and SSR 96-8p).

Step 4:  Does the claimant have the residual functional capacity to perform the requirements of past relevant work, as defined in 20 CFR 404.1520(f)?  Only work performed at substantial gainful activity level during the past 15 years may be considered.  If the claimant has no past relevant work experience or if he/she is not able to perform any past relevant work, the analysis proceeds to the fifth step.

Step 5:  Using the same RFC that was used in Step 4, is the claimant able to perform any other work, considering his/her age, education and work experience.  If the claimant is able to do other work, he/she is not disabled.  If not, the claimant will be found disabled.

As we can see, a disability hearing runs on a very structured and preordained course. An experienced disability representative knows exactly what must be proven to win the case.  That is not to say that the judge has no discretionary powers.  The judge may, for instance give great weight to one medical opinion and little weight to another doctor's opinion.  The judge may find that the claimant's testimony is credible or not.  Different judges will run their hearings in different ways; however, all must address the five step process as outlined here.

I hope claimants can also see that this is probably not a process that they want to handle without representation.  Appearing at a hearing without representation may actually delay the case because many judges will advise the claimant of their right to get representation and "recommend" that the hearing be delayed until adequate representation is obtained.  Claimants may, of course, insist on non-representation and appear on their on behalf.  The question is, would that be the wise thing to do?

The Forsythe Firm practices exclusively in the field of Social Security representation from its offices in Huntsville, Alabama.  You may contact them at (256) 799-0297 or www.forsythefirm.com


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

GETTING MONEY FROM SSDI

POST HEARING EVIDENCE

PARTIALLY FAVORABLE DECISIONS ON DISABILITY