"PAST RELEVANT WORK"

If Social Security finds that a claimant can perform any "past relevant work," then he is not eligible for Social Security disability benefits.

The term "past relevant work" may not be what it seems, however.  In order to qualify as past relevant work (prw) - the following 3 things must be true:

  • The work was performed during the past 15 years.
  • The work was performed at the level of substantial gainful activity (simply defined as full-time work).
  • The work was performed long enough for the claimant to learn how to do the work.
If any one of the above requirements are not met, then the work fails the definition of "past relevant work."

For example, I once had a claimant who had worked for 3 years as an electrician's helper.  The vocational expert classified this as semi-skilled past relevant work.  Therefore, if the claimant could still perform the work of an electrician's helper, he would not be disabled.

The problem is that the claimant was not really an electrician's helper.  He was merely given that title.  When he described his work, he said he fetched things from the truck, helped unroll wire and did other unskilled work.  So, he had no past relevant work that was semi-skilled.  That made a huge difference in the outcome of his claim.

A person might get a job in which he is expected to perform highly skilled work.  However, if he doesn't work long enough to learn how to do the work, it doesn't count as PRW.  The same is true if the individual only worked occasionally but not at a substantial gainful level.

At disability hearings, judges are supposed to be careful to clarify such facts.  But often it is up to the claimant or the claimant's legal representative to make sure that such facts are entered into the record correctly.  A favorable decision may hinge on this information.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

GETTING MONEY FROM SSDI

POST HEARING EVIDENCE

CAN YOU GET DISABILITY FOR SLEEP DISORDERS? HOW?